Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 4 Correlations between left ventricular deformation and cardiopulmonary exercise capacity

From: Effect of maximum exercise on left ventricular deformation and its correlation with cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in competitive athletes

Mean values ± SD

Handball players

(Semi-recumbent ergometer)

Football players

(Treadmill)

Pearson’s R

P value

Pearson’s R

P value

VO2max vs. GLS at rest

0.047

0.880

0.219

0.367

VO2max vs. GLS after CPET

− 0.067

0.828

− 0.041

0.869

VO2max vs. ΔGLS

− 0.136

0.657

− 0.325

0.175

Relative VO2max vs. GLS at rest

− 0.019

0.952

0.008

0.974

Relative VO2max vs. GLS after CPET

0.112

0.716

0.094

0.701

Relative VO2max vs. ΔGLS

0.159

0.605

0.093

0.706

VO2max vs. GWI at rest

− 0.428

0.144

0.031

0.901

VO2max vs. GWI after CPET

0.631

0.021*

0.336

0.160

VO2max vs. ΔGWI

0.762

0.002*

0.346

0.147

Relative VO2max vs. GWI at rest

− 0.415

0.159

− 0.099

0.688

Relative VO2max vs. GWI after CPET

0.502

0.080

0.459

0.048*

Relative VO2max vs. ΔGWI

0.671

0.012*

0.592

0.008*

  1. *Statistically significant (p < 0.05). SD: standard deviation; VO2max: maximum oxygen uptake; GLS: global longitudinal strain; GWI: global myocardial work index; CPET: cardiopulmonary exercise testing; Δ: change before and after CPET