Skip to main content
Download PDF

Is transnasal TEE imaging a viable alternative to conventional TEE during structural cardiac interventions to avoid general anaesthesia? A pilot comparison study of image quality

Echo Research & Practice volume 4, pages 1–7 (2017)Cite this article

Abstract

Aim The role of transoesophageal echocardiography in cardiac interventional structural procedures is well established and appreciated. However, the need for general anaesthesia (GA) throughout the procedure remains a controversial issue. The aim of the present study is to assess the feasibility and imaging quality of using a transnasal microrobe that allows the usage of conscious sedation in patients who undergo cardiac structural interventional procedures without missing the benefits, guidance and navigation of conventional trans-procedural TEE.

Methods We analysed the trans-procedural images of 24 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI, TMVI or ASD/PFO closure, using a transnasal 2D microprobe (PHILIPS) and then we compared them with images taken by using a conventional 3D TEE probe (PHILIPS). In particular, we compared the imaging quality of the two probes regarding: (1) The anatomy, visualisation of valvular calcification and transvalvular colour Doppler of the aortic and mitral valve; (2) the imaging quality of PFO, ASD and interatrial communication colour flow; (3) the imaging of left ventricle systolic function and pericardial space and (4) transgastric imaging.

Results: All images were graded with a scale from 5 to 1. The average grade of imaging quality in the mitral valve was: anatomy, 4.3; calcification, 3.8; colour Doppler, 4.2. The average grade of imaging quality in the aortic valve was: anatomy, 4.3; calcification, 3.7; colour Doppler, 4.3. The average grade of imaging quality in PFO/ASD was 4.3. The average grade of imaging quality in LV/pericardial space was 4.2. The average grade of imaging quality in transgastric imaging was 4.1.

Conclusion: These results suggest that transnasal TEE can provide good anatomical image quality of relevant cardiac structures during cardiac structural interventions and this may facilitate these procedures being performed during conscious sedation without having to lose TEE guidance.

References

  1. Maas EH, Pieters BM, Van de Velde M, Rex S 2016 General or local anesthesia for TAVI? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Current Pharmaceutical Design 22 1868–1878. (doi:10.2174/1381612822666151208121825)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pislaru SV, Michelena HI, Mankad SV 2014 Interventional echocardiography. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 57 32–46. (doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2014.05.009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Balanika M, Smyrli A, Samanidis G, Spargias K, Stavridis G, Karavolias G, Khoury M, Voudris V, Lacoumenta S 2014 Anesthetic management of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 28 285–289. (doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2013.07.010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mayr NP, Michel J, Bleiziffer S, Tassani P, Martin K 2015 Sedation or general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Journal of Thoracic Disease 7 1518–1526. (doi:10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.08.21)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ancoli-Israel S, Coy T 1994 Are breathing disturbances in elderly equivalent to sleep apnea syndrome? Sleep 17 (Supplement 8) 77–83. (doi:10.1093/sleep/17.suppl_8.S77)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoch CC, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Buysse DJ, Yeager AL, Houck PR, Kupfer DJ 1990 Comparison of sleep-disordered breathing among healthy elderly in the seventh, eighth, and ninth decades of life. Sleep 13 502–511.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. D’Angelo OM, Diaz-Gil D, Nunn D, Simons JC, Gianatasio C, Mueller N, Meyer MJ, Pierce E, Rosow C, Eikermann M 2014 Anesthesia and increased hypercarbic drive impair the coordination between breathing and swallowing. Anesthesiology 121 1175–1183. (doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000000462)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mayr NP, Hapfelmeier A, Martin K, Kurz A, van der Starre P, Babik B, Mazzitelli D, Lange R, Wiesner G, Tassani-Prell P 2016 Comparison of sedation and general anaesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation on cerebral oxygen saturation and neurocognitive outcome. British Journal of Anaesthesia 116 90–99. (doi:10.1093/bja/aev294)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brecker SJ, Bleiziffer S, Bosmans J, Gerckens U, Tamburino C, Wenaweser P, Linke A ADVANCE Study Investigators 2016 Impact of anesthesia type on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (from the Multicenter ADVANCE Study). American Journal of Cardiology 117 1332–1338. (doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.01.027)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kadakia MB, Silvestry FE, Herrmann HC 2015 Intracardiac echocardiography-guided transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 85 497–501. (doi:10.1002/ccd.25409)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Masson JB, Kouz R, Riahi M, Nguyen Thanh HK, Potvin J, Naim C, Salem R, Raymond JM 2015 Transcatheter left atrial appendage closure using intracardiac echocardiographic guidance from the left atrium. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 31 1497.e7-1497.e14. (doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2015.04.031)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cardiology Department, King’s College Hospital NHS Trust, King’s College Hospital, London, UK

    Dimitris Klettas, Rafal Dworakowski, Philip MacCarthy & Mark Monaghan

  2. Anesthesiology Department, King’s College Hospital NHS Trust, King’s College Hospital, London, UK

    Emma Alcock

Authors
  1. Dimitris Klettas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emma Alcock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rafal Dworakowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Philip MacCarthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mark Monaghan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitris Klettas.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klettas, D., Alcock, E., Dworakowski, R. et al. Is transnasal TEE imaging a viable alternative to conventional TEE during structural cardiac interventions to avoid general anaesthesia? A pilot comparison study of image quality. Echo Res Pract 4, 1–7 (2017). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1530/ERP-16-0029

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1530/ERP-16-0029

Keywords

Echo Research & Practice

ISSN: 2055-0464

Contact us